Showing posts with label Guest bloggers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest bloggers. Show all posts

Broken Britain and the New Age of Anarchy: by Laury Jeanneret







Laury Louise Jeanneret is a talented, UK-based writer who has her own blog, http://aroomofonesown-llj.blogspot.com/



We are old work pals and when I asked Laury to write a piece on the London riots, she told me she was already planning one. This is a thought-provoking, passionate piece, and I invite you to read it in full, and comment.







Broken Britain and the New Age of Anarchy: by Laury Jeanneret



For the past week I, like many other Britons, have watched in horror as my capital city has burned and countless other cities across this once green and pleasant land have turned into war zones. Images of young people adorned in hoodies, faces covered, pelting police with stones, packing their cars with goods looted from local shops, throwing Molotov cocktails onto centuries’ worth of heritage have been broadcast across the world.



The wanton savagery has taken my breath away, other nations watching the destruction from afar, must surely wonder what has gone so wrong in British society, what is so rotten here, that our citizens would be incited to revolt in such a nihilistic way. But amidst the carnage one thing seems startlingly resonant to me, the fact that I am not surprised by the depths that my countrymen have sunk to. Disgusted, yes, but surprised, sadly, no.



The trouble started on Thursday night when in a 29-year-old black man, and father of four, from Tottenham in north London was shot dead by the Metropolitan Police's Operation Trident team. I mention Mr Duggan’s race because I believe it is paramount to understanding the violence that his death provoked.



Mr Duggan had allegedly been under surveillance by the police for some time, he has widely been touted in the more right-wing British press as a “gangster” and a prominent “elder” from the notorious Broadwater Farm estate. Known by the nickname “Starrish Mark” it is alleged he had links to infamous north London gangs such as the Broadwater Farm Posse and Tottenham Mandem. A claim that his girlfriend, Simone Wilson, vehemently denies.



Initial reports following Mr Duggan’s death stated that he had been shot by the police after opening fire on an officer from Scotland Yard’s elite firearms squad, the bullet from his firearm having been lodged in the police radio. This week the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) found that Mr Duggan had not opened fire on police.



In a statement released on Tuesday the IPCC said that the bullet lodged in the radio was, in fact, a police issue bullet “consistent with having been fired from a [police] Heckler and Koch MP5”. It transpired that during events last Thursday two shots were fired, both by police. An inquest into Mr Duggan's death was opened on Tuesday but has now been adjourned until December.



Following this fatal shooting last Thursday night a peaceful protest began in Tottenham, around 100 people marched from Broadwater Farm to Tottenham police station and held a vigil there, demanding answers, and justice for the death of a popular member of their community. The significance of this cannot be underestimated.



London’s ethnic communities have a bloody history with the Metropolitan Police; many have compared the scenes of the last few days with the riots that swept the capital in the eighties, which also erupted during a recession. The 1981 Brixton riots were sparked when Michael Bailey, a young black man who had been stabbed, was perceived not to have received adequate medical attention from police officers on the scene.



In 1985 more riots raged in Brixton when Dorothy “Cherry” Groce was left paralysed after being shot in her bed by police as they searched her house in relation to offences they suspected her son, Michael Groce, of committing. Days later tensions flared between the black community and the police north of the river when, following the arrest of a young black man, Floyd Jarret, over a suspected motoring offence the police raided the home of his 49-year-old mother, Cynthia Jarrett on the Broadwater Farm estate in Tottenham, during which she suffered a stroke and died.



The topography of events precipitating such outbreaks of violence is pivotal. Areas such as Brixton, Hackney and Tottenham, are high density inner-city areas with large Afro-Caribbean populations, what permeates these streets is the long-running resentment between the authorities and local communities who feel that they are constantly harassed by police using stop and search powers and unreasonable force without just cause.



Unemployment is high, opportunities are few, the stench of poverty is all around. The London borough that houses Tottenham has an unemployment rate double the national average, resources are thin on the ground, child poverty and deprivation is rife.



Thirty years on from the Brixton riots the black and ethnic community’s relationship with police has not changed. As Nina Power of The Guardian commented this week “when you look at the figures for deaths in police custody (at least 333 since 1998 and not a single conviction of any police officer for any of them), then the IPCC and the courts are seen by many, quite reasonably, to be protecting the police rather than the people”.



But of course the 2011 UK riots are not just a case of race clashes between ethnic communities and the establishment, over a decade in to this new millennium; it is more complex than that. It is about a whole sector of our society so disillusioned with their lives, and their lack of prospects, that they feel they no longer have a viable stake in that society, and are therefore, not governed by its laws.



Britain in 2011 is a bleak place for all but the privileged minority. The gap between rich and poor grows ever wider, it has been reported that the richest 10% are now 100 times better off than the poorest. Why are we surprised that a cultural and financial backdrop such as this would eventually provoke hostility? Social mobility in the UK is one of the lowest of any other developed nation. For many it is not just about where they are now, it is the heartbreaking realisation that no matter what legitimate efforts they make, there is no room to manoeuvre themselves to a better life. It is the total absence of hope.



In the last year we have seen numerous protests amidst the toughest austerity measures since World War Two, students have taken to the streets as university tuition fees have been hiked, teachers have walked out on strike after cuts to their pensions and a proposed raising of the retirement age means they will be working longer and paying increased contributions, to receive less upon retirement.



Over 450,000 public sector jobs are to be axed; the Child Trust Fund has been discontinued. The social housing budget has been slashed by 50%, and housing associations will now be able to charge 80% of the market rent rate, rather than their formerly subsidised rents. In March this year Chancellor George Osborne presented his budget to the nation and unveiled plans to cut the Winter Fuel Allowance for pensioners, reducing it by £50 for the over 60s and £100 for the over 80s.



Meanwhile, the cost of living has soared as energy suppliers have hiked their tariffs, just last month Scottish and Southern Energy increased their prices for electricity and gas by 11 and 18% respectively. This, following a price hike by British Gas of 16 and 18%, and Scottish Power's early-June price increase of 10% and 19%.



Across the country maternity wards have been closed down, funding for “non-essential” services, such as youth clubs, withdrawn, in March this year £5.7 million was cut from the budget in the London borough of Southwark from children’s social care and safeguarding services (a trend that continued throughout other London boroughs and county councils across the country).



Working Tax Credits, a top-up for families on low incomes and a lifeline to many, is due to be slashed in 2012 to be replaced with a “universal credit”, for which the qualifying criteria has been kept a closely guarded secret amidst fear of further protests, VAT has risen to 20%, whilst proposed cuts to police numbers could mean over 16,000 police officers (ironically the same number deployed to London in recent days), 1800 community support officers and 16,100 police staff jobs are axed.



According to recent figures from the International Labour Organisation there are now 2.45 million unemployed in Britain, which is over 7% of the workforce, there are 1.52 million claiming benefits, and yet somehow the rich still seem to be getting richer, the bankers are still receiving their bonuses while the bakers are no longer able to put bread on their own tables.



The mood of the country is black, so many have lost heart in the agencies that are meant to help them as under-resourced Social Services teams struggle to cope with crippling caseloads and more children in need go unchecked (as the horrific death of baby Peter Connelly in Haringey so grotesquely demonstrated in 2007 when authorities failed to detect the 50 injuries, including a broken back, that the 17-month-old infant had sustained over an 8-month period).



Hospitals have fewer beds and chronic staff shortages, local mental health teams increasingly overstretched with the number of people in distress can offer only the paltriest of help to their most vulnerable residents. Even in my own leafy enclave of East Sussex, a far cry from the ghettos of London, community crisis teams have been instructed that they are only to respond to the “actively suicidal”, which by anyone’s standards seems a little late.



And amidst this increasingly fractured backdrop a disturbing culture of social exclusion has been nurtured, alienated from a society that can’t and won’t offer any other option to the crushing poverty of so many, new, self-governing communities have been fostered. Communities where teenage gangs take the place of disintegrating family units, gang leaders or “elders” offer crime as a viable alternative to countless applications for the few available menial jobs. Relationships with the authorities have broken down as the discourse between the powerful and the powerless becomes increasingly fractious.



Whilst working in South Africa in 2005 I witnessed something similar among that country’s poorest residents, speaking to me then about the loss of youngsters to criminal gangs Inspector Bernadine Steyn of the South African Police Service (SAPS) said: “The high unemployment rate is a factor. Drug lords and gang leaders create job opportunities for individuals seeking a means to support their families financially. Gangsterism is in fact a very lucrative business”.



Over the last few days I have seen dozens of comments across social networking sites about the “sheer criminality” of what has transpired in the UK this week, people lamenting the fact that looters have chosen to smash up “their own backyard without cause” as reasoning that these riots are not politically motivated, that it is just mob-rule at its most base.



But to take this stand is surely to miss the point, across the world, it is the poorest, most socially excluded societies that are the most dangerous, from the townships of South Africa to the favelas of Brazil, it is the most deprived conurbations that fall victim to the highest crime rates and social dysfunction. Scratch the surface of any unequal society and you will find almost endemic lawlessness within the pockets of poverty.



London, of course, is not Cape Town or Brazil, but poverty is poverty, whether it is Peckham or Pretoria. There is also another difference between the trouble-spots of the developing world and Britain, in South Africa the problems are not just racial segregation, they are also spacial. The townships sprawl on the outskirts of the cities, a far cry from the salubrious suburbs inhabited by the (predominantly) wealthy whites.



In London the haves live side-by-side with the have-nots as more and more gritty working class areas such as Clapham and Hoxton are gentrified by the Cappuccino Set. In the case of Hoxton, in the London borough of Hackney, the arrival of trendy highflyers from the city’s west priced many local people out of their home borough, it was not unusual in the nineties to see local residents wandering around with tee-shirts emblazoned with the slogan “Fu*k off back to Notting Hill” across them.



The polarities of rich and poor in these areas are everywhere, and it is not difficult to understand the simmering resentment that this causes when people who already feel disengaged from society begin to feel they do not even belong where they were born and raised. As Camila Batmanghelidjh wrote in her searingly moving piece for The Independent this week:



“It's not one occasional attack on dignity, it's a repeated humiliation, being continuously dispossessed in a society rich with possession. Young, intelligent citizens of the ghetto seek an explanation for why they are at the receiving end of bleak Britain, condemned to a darkness where their humanity is not even valued enough to be helped. Savagery is a possibility within us all. Some of us have been lucky enough not to have to call upon it for survival; others, exhausted from failure, can justify resorting to it.”



We have fostered a society for the last three decades driven by an insatiable desire for ever-greater consumption, we have been encouraged to attribute our self-worth to our brand of TV or mobile phone, to dig ourselves further into debt to finance aspirational lifestyles way beyond our means. What we have witnessed in our country over the past week has been a distortion of those ideals, a grisly tableaux of a consumer society at its most savage.



Looters perusing the aisles of smashed up department stores holding items of clothing up to themselves to see if they fit before stealing them, rifling through the rubble of merchandise for their favourite brand, to call it “criminal opportunism”, as it has been branded by so many this week, is exactly right, it is opportunism in the face of a society where precious little opportunities exist.



Where people are tired of being bottom of the food chain in a suffocating class structure that enables only the very few to succeed and where the young are so disaffected with a community that appears to care very little about them that they have ceased to care about it. To coin Oliver James’ phrase, it is “affluenza” at its most ugly.



And as the clean-up of our major cities gets under way, it is not just the smashed in windows and burnt out buildings that we need to worry about, those things can be fixed, and soon it will be business as usual as the tills start ringing again. In the early nineties indie band Carter USM wrote widely about what it felt like to live on the breadline in London. When I was 16 I watched them play to a packed crowd in Finsbury Park, three miles away from Tottenham:



“All of my unworldly goods, the bailiffs took them too”, they sang, “for all the ducked bills and silly sods from Brian Mills' catalogue, something borrowed, bartered and blew. You win some and you lose some and you save nothing for a rainy day, you need your NutraSweet daddy, some peppermint paddy or just a hackneyed old cabbie, who can drive you and your babby away”. Not much has changed since then for the likes of Britain’s poor. It is not just our cities that have been broken, it is also our people.

When it comes to marriage equality, hold the nuts. By Drew Sheldrick



















There has been much discussion and debate recently surrounding gay marriage. I enlisted Drew Sheldrick, journalist for gay and lesbian newspapers Sydney Star Observer and Southern Star Observer (you must follow him on Twitter via @DrewBoyTweets) to write a piece on the topic. I invite you to share this link, and comment.

When it comes to marriage equality, hold the nuts. By Drew Sheldrick

In March this year, Kerri-Anne Kennerley’s morning show hosted a debate between Australian Marriage Equality’s Alex Greenwich and Christian Democratic Party candidate Peter Madden.

At the conclusion of the discussion between the same-sex marriage advocate and the anti-gay Christian, Kennerley turned to Greenwich and confidently told him that she hoped he “appreciated the fairly good even spread of information here”. I was struck by the comment.

While no one expects the kind of soft-news/lifestyle programming of Kerri-Anne to be on the front line of balanced current affairs debate, Kennerley’s perception of what constituted an even playing field in discussing GLBTI issues – and particularly marriage equality - is indicative of a wider problem with Australian media outlets.

Why are we turning to the likes of Madden expecting reasoned argument in these debates? A self-confessed sex addict who told media outlets that he’d visited brothels and hired prostitutes, Madden one day decided to become a Christian pastor and run for state parliament on what was mostly an anti-gay platform of shutting down Mardi Gras and upholding the ‘sanctity of marriage’.

He’s in good company in the early morning hours. Channel Seven’s Sunrise is more a fan of former Family First candidate-turned-Australian Christian Lobby spokesperson Wendy Francis. Francis once compared same-sex marriage to “legalising child abuse” and has these days turned her attention to taking down safe-sex advertising campaigns claiming they’re hurting children.

This week, in light of the passage of same-sex marriage legislation in New York, News Limited ran two anti-marriage equality opinion columns on the same day. One was in the Courier Mail and the other on The Punch. Both were from representatives of two separate ‘family’ organisations and the Courier Mail piece went as far as labeling the children of same-sex couples as a new ‘stolen generation’ and implied homosexuality was something that could be cured.

The Queensland paper went on to post a counter opinion on the same page as the piece, but not until hours after it was originally put online and disgust had spread through social media at the decision to publish at all.

Dr David van Gend, the writer of that particularly abhorrent op-ed, is a spokesman for the Family Council of Queensland, and the author of The Punch’s piece was Tim Cannon, the media spokesperson and national research officer of the Australian Family Association.

Through inviting the representatives of these groups on respected news and current affairs programs or into mainstream publications to discuss marriage equality, their opinions are being elevated to the level of what is considered rational discourse, when they really have no right to be.

In the US, CNN has come under continued pressure from advocacy groups for continuing to invite representatives of these religious groups masquerading as all-embracing family advocates.

Popular guests of the network include members of the Family Research Council (FRC), a group that claims higher rates of teen suicide among gay teenagers is simply because homosexuality is “abnormal”.

The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD) see their continued media platform as an unfair equation of viewpoints on GLBTI matters.

Take the debate between the FRC’s Peter Sprigg and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (DADT) repeal activist Alex Nicholson on the network in January this year.

Nicholson’s qualifications in regards to the military ban on openly gay servicemen and women was clear. He was an openly gay, former army intelligence officer, who could give firsthand accounts of how the discriminatory policy played out in the daily lives of gay and lesbian service members.

Sprigg came exclusively from his job at the FRC and in pairing him with Nicholson, GLADD argued that CNN told its millions of viewers that both these men should be seen as equally valuable to the discussion.

FRC representatives are also invited onto American news networks such as MSNBC and Fox News on a regular basis. There they continue to quote lies about the GLBTI community and their families from discredited “research” groups such as the American College of Pediatricians, which was started by notorious ex-gay therapy promoter George Alan Rekers, a Baptist minister caught holidaying with rent-boys in 2010.

GLADD’s issue is not that the media is taking on these groups; in fact they strongly support exposing their archaic views on television for what they truly are. No, GLADD believe that the media are elevating the hurtful messages and attitudes of people like Sprigg, claiming they are somehow equally weighted with someone like Nicholson’s real life experience and firsthand facts.

I’m the first to admit that it makes for entertaining - if occasionally infuriating - television, but that doesn’t make it a legitimate source of opinion. It’s time we jumped on board with the Americans and called for these invitations for comment to end.

This is not a matter of denying the right of free speech to those whose views one doesn’t agree with, it’s about what constitutes balance. It’s time for producers and editors alike to raise the bar when inviting commentators to debate. It’s not just lazy journalism, it’s potentially harmful.

The discriminatory and hateful rhetoric of people like Madden and Francis does nothing but make young people in the GLBTI community feel even lower self-worth. They represent a viewpoint on marriage equality not grounded simply in tradition, political or legal opposition, they speak for pockets of prejudice and bigotry in their chosen religions.

While the US still has some resistance to interracial marriage – as witnessed in 2009 when a Louisiana justice of the peace refused to officiate a civil wedding for an interracial couple – you’d be hard pressed to find a network willing to invite a white supremacist on the air for a robust debate about decades of anti-miscegenation law reform.

You want to have a debate on marriage equality, let’s do it. But let’s stop giving the hate-speech of these extremists more oxygen than it deserves.

Drew is a journalist for gay and lesbian newspapers Sydney Star Observer and Southern Star Observer. Follow him on Twitter via @DrewBoyTweets

The Popcorn Taxi Blog - "Gettin’ off your arse!" by Chris Murray



Popcorn Taxi hosted the world premiere of the highly anticipated, much-hyped film The Tunnel.

Here's a blog by Chris Murray, Creative Director of Popcorn Taxi, entitled "Gettin' off your arse!"





“Oh, it’s so hard making a film in Australia…”
“There’s no industry here, it’s just not worth it…”
“You’re better off going to the States and making something there…”

Bullshit.

A couple of guys, editors by trade, have managed to garner more hype for a low-budget film than any other in recent memory.

Officially launched last night at Popcorn Taxi, ‘The Tunnel” is the result of a unique model asking punters to spend $1 on purchasing a single frame from the film, sight unseen. The film is then ‘given back’ to the public via Bit-Torrent for a legal and free download. A fair trade if ever there was one.

Enlisting an enthusiastic first-time director; the comforting advice of a group of people who know their stuff, and an innovative online agency with a difference; the wheels were in motion and the pre-production plus a calculated hype campaign kicked into high gear.

In-the-can in a staggering non-sequential 14-day shoot (including pick-ups), the post-production process (edited completely by the writer/producers) melted into the wee hours and with a teaser and a few behind-the-scenes offerings plus an opening credit sequence, the film was launched to the media on Dec 7, 2010.

Fast-forward to May 2011 and much has happened. A sneak-peak at A Night of Horror Film Festival to a packed house; a DVD distribution deal with Transmission Films inked, a sales agent in Cannes, a Showtime release schedule and an exclusive deal with Bit-Torrent to be actively promoted to their 100 million plus subscribers. Not bad.


To read the rest of this brilliant blog, go here: http://www.popcorntaxi.com.au/2011/05/blog/gettin-off-your-arse/

Rosemount Australian Fashion Week, 2011 - key trends, by Lucinda Burtt





This guest post is from Lucinda Burtt, blogger behind the beautiful site Thrift & Thread at www.thriftandthread.com

Check it out, and enjoy the gorgeous photography and layout.

Lucinda has kindly written a guest blog post for Josie's Juice readers, posted below. Enjoy the read, and the stunning fashion photos:

Prints, pleats, brights and whites. If the spring/summer 2011/12 collections presented at Rosemount Australian Fashion Week are anything to go by, these are the trends we’ll be seeing when we’re shopping for swimwear instead of scarves.

Prints

Over the years Josh Goot has established himself as a master of digital prints and this much anticipated spring/summer collection was no exception. Working again with graphic artist Shane Sakkeus, his streamlined dresses and billowy tunics became canvasses for paint splatters and jagged smears. Staged in an industrial cavernous space in East Sydney, Goot presented his prints alongside candy stripe dresses and technical neoprene ensembles signalling a welcome return for the label.

Pleats

Pleats have been trending for some time now and they simply dominated the RAFW runways. At Magdalena Velveska the sharp knife-pleats were softened by diagonal cuts and uneven hems in a range of ice-cream hues mixed with monochromatics. Strong tailoring and an eye for detail make this young designer one to watch.

Brights

From fuchsia to fluoro orange, cyan to cobalt, lemon yellow to lime, brights lit up the catwalk in an array of dazzling shades. Leave it to Gary Bigeni however to work bold colour into the kind of wearable essentials that would easily slip into any woman’s summer wardrobe. Cerulean blue was paired to maximum effect with burnt orange – another of RAFW’s favourite shades – as well as turquoise and in bold stripe. Elsewhere the master of draping mixed tomato red with buttery leather and dove grey in the shape of streamlined jackets, fluid dresses and basics.

Whites

A summer favourite, white made its mark throughout the summer collections from streamlined shifts to flowing Grecian goddess gowns. Working with their trademark textiles, emerging label Uscari presented a dramatic collection in pristine whites, creams and blush peach. Layering was the order of the day with silk dresses paired with stretch cotton singlets and open knit weaves making this white collection anything but cliché.

To read more of Lucinda’s thoughts and see some of her backstage RAFW photos check out her blog Thrift & Thread at www.thriftandthread.com

Guest Blogger - Tiffany Farrington: How To Lose A Job In PR


Tiffany Farrington, founder of the innovative Social Diary and PR industry stalwart, wrote a blog post recently on losing a job in PR.

So many people I know want to work in PR - and anyone who works in the industry will tell you just how much hard work is involved. Here are some pointers from Tiff to ensure that once you are in the industry, you stay there...

(Tiffany is pictured here at the 2009 Social DAIRY Christmas party, dressed as a carton of Social Dairy milk. Of course! Tiff's parties, held each year for the media and associated industries, are LEGENDARY - hands down the best in the country!)

How to Lose a Job in PR

Everyone talks about how tricky it can be to get a job in PR and the various ways to get your foot in the door, but perhaps we should have just as much discussion on how to keep the job once you actually get it. So you've gone to Uni, studied PR, done some work experience, completed an internship, and scored a job - what do you do to ensure you don't lose it? As I've blogged before, there is NO crime in making a mistake - we are all human, and it's how you handle that mistake that proves your worth. Being shown the door is usually not due to mistakes, but rather deep-rooted character traits. I chatted with a group of Sydney's top PRs to find out exactly what the fireable offences were...

Lies & Cover-ups
Who could forget the pearler about the PR gal who doctored an email to a client and got caught? See my previous blog, PR F@#k Ups. Lies & cover ups of this kind are the very worst, so it's ALWAYS best to 'fess up rather than cover up.

One PR states "One of my Senior Account Managers was in effect useless, but constantly blamed me or the client for not getting results. After questioning her for months, sitting in meetings where I knew she was lying, we finally got an email saying our services were not going to be renewed - with the finger firmly pointing at her. When confronted she just looked at me blankly and said the client was a punish and she didn't want to work on it anyway - and so it was best the agency didn't have them on board anymore! She is hardly in a position to decide what's best for my agency. Needless to say...Sayonara."

Theft
For one top PR, a theft was accidentally stumbled upon after a media sendout of luxe grog was one case short. Two weeks later, a friend of the boss came in the office, saw the grog in question and said "Wow, you've got those, I went to a party recently and she had them too!" Apparently young...let's call her Shazza Sticky-Fingers had taken it upon herself to relieve the office of the case for a party she was having at home. And of course, they had taken delivery of the only batch of the product available in the whole country. All eyes then darted to young Shazza, who nervously pretended to receive a phone call and quickly left the room...only to return to hear the boss say, "Shazza, in my office. Now." And to make matters worse for herself? Her response to being fired was "Well I'm not happy here anyway". There is nothing more class-less that being ungracious in the face of the firing squad when you have been so spectacularly sprung. See ya Shaz!

Partying too hard
One PR friend says: "We flew a junior to Melbourne to work on a music gig and she decided to carry on all night long, ringing with a bollocks story the next morning about missing her flight. Pics immediately surfaced of her on Facebook as well as in Sydney Confidential of her partying hard, clearly off chops. BUSTED."

Another company tells of a 9am new business meeting the morning after a huge media launch. An employee, let's call her Sleepy Sheila, rocked up to the office at 8:50am in the same clothes from the day before, smelling like vom and begging for chewing gum. After frantically trying to get it together, the meeting commenced. The witness says: "Within 20 minutes, her eyes started dropping and her elbow slouched onto the table as she desperately tried to keep her head upright. Within another 10 minutes, Sleepy was officially snoozing. It took another 15 minutes for the team director to realise, and luckily at this point the client had failed to notice. One team member nudged Sleepy and another started coughing loudly but nothing worked. Eventually the client noticed and asked the director to wake the girl. Sleepy promptly found herself unemployed...and most likely returned to the woods to join the other 6 dwarves."

To read the rest of this scarily accurate piece, go here:

http://socialdiaryaustralia.blogspot.com/2010/11/how-to-lose-job-in-pr.html

And to follow Tiffany on Twitter, go here: http://twitter.com/tiffsocialdiary

Guest blogger: Dan Gilmore. “Who do you prefer: He-Man or McGuyver?”

Dan Gilmore is a old work pal of mine and has started blogging. So I asked him to feature as guest blogger here... and convinced him to write his own bio:

"Dan is a creative chap, which means his thoughts are usually far, far away from the things that other grown-ups fret about. He runs the website of a children's hospital charity in Brisbane, annoys his housemate with banjo music, and rocks a stylish cowboy hat. Dan Does NaNoWriMo is his first attempt at a serialised dating memoir."

Here is a piece entitled "Speed Dating", by Dan does NaNoWriMo

“Who do you prefer: He-Man or McGuyver?”

Of the people sitting around the table, four noses crinkle, one mouth laughs, and one face asks “Who's He-Man?”. I've just admitted my plans for tonight involve a speed-dating event. Now we're workshopping conversation starters.

Geoff's nose had crinkled but then he laughed. “That's the kind of question only you could get away with, Dan.”

Louise, one of our other sub-editors, declares: “You can't ask that – it's too obvious!”

Nate Devenish chips in. “Man, if you get some chick that says she loves He-Man, you gotta get her home. It means she's into naked chests and furry underpants. That's a licence to do every-fucking-thing.”

Louise isn't even sitting next to Nate and I can see her try to scootch every atom of her body away from him without looking like she's trying to escape him.

“Hey Lou, who do you prefer then? He-Man vs McGuyver?” I ask.

“...He-Man.” Her cheeks flush with a dirty embarrassment. Nate doesn't even slow down to smirk about his rumoured triumph with Lou. He's the kind of guy who sees any conquest as a victory - he probably smirked while I was watching Lou's reaction. A voice in the back of my head speaks with Nate's voice: “I bet he blows his load too quickly in bed too, man!”. A voice in the front of my mind speaks with my voice and suggests it's time to see a psychiatrist.

Anyway, the real Nate just jumped on the conversation. “See, what you wanna do is imply you got this amazing control over your dick. It's all about your confidence, man. Doesn't matter if they're good looking or not – fuck, they can't all be pretty runs on your way to a century, right?”

The rest of the table ignores Nate or awkwardly reach for their beers. I'm nervous and desperate for advice. Gotta keep this conversation alive.

To continue reading, go to: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/notes/dan-does-nanowrimo/speed-dating/120495468014027

And to follow more of Dan's musings on dating, go here and click 'like':

http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Dan-does-NaNoWriMo/168840766474942

Guest blogger: Jessica Ainscough. Q&A with Annalise Braakensiek.



Jessica Ainscough is an old work buddy of mine and an inspiration. Read her bio, in her own words, to see why...

"I began my writing career as the editorial assistant and social reporter for Nine to Five and City Weekly magazines in Sydney. After a couple of years there I landed a job at Dolly, helping to solve puberty blues one teen at a time. All that changed when I was diagnosed with a very rare, very aggressive cancer called Epithelioid Sarcoma. I quit my job and moved back to my hometown, the beautiful Sunshine Coast. I swapped back-to-back parties for rest and relaxation and ditched a diet that consisted mostly of champagne, canapĂ©s and late night Macca’s to become a carrot juice-guzzling, lentil-loving vegan. I now spend my time juicing, meditating, practicing Bikram yoga and learning everything I can about healing."

Here we feature another guest blog from the talented writer:

Q&A with Annalise Braakensiek – model, actress, entrepreneur and creator of the organic catering company, Love Lunch

Blonde hair, killer body, pretty face – it's pretty easy to write Annalise Braakensiek off as just another hot Aussie model. However, take one look at her long list of eclectic credentials and your opinion of her swiftly changes. Annalise may be best known here in Oz for her work as a model, actress and television personality, but what many of you may not know about her is that she is also a keen vegetarian chef, the designer of an eco-friendly range of lingerie and a tireless advocate for animal rights. High on her list of achievements is the 2008 launch of Love Lunch, her organic, meat-free catering company that focuses on delivering delicious and healthy lunches.

What does "wellness" mean to you?
Eating a balanced organic meat free diet, exercising, laughing and sleeping lots and drinking plenty of purified water.

What sparked your interest in healthy food?
I was fortunate enough to have been brought up on a biodynamic farm, so I have never known any other way. It's wonderful to be able to share that with others... to provide people with healthy, delicious food.

To read the rest of this piece, go here: http://thewellnesswarrior.blogspot.com/2010/11/q-with-annalise-braakensiek-model.html